Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
F. Murgett
To Win
J. V. Emburgh
To Win
Finn Murgett vs Jake Van Emburgh Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - 11-15-23
By Wojtek Kolan - November 15, 2023
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Murgett vs Emburgh analysis and find out who is favored!
Upcoming Match
Murgett VS Emburgh PREDICTION I.hard
M25 Columbus atp
15 Nov 2023 / First
ODDS
Murgett Vs Emburgh Match Overview - When Will They Play?
Finn Murgett takes on Jake Van Emburgh in the ATP M25 Columbus Men's Singles 2023 on November 15, 2023. Our Expert betting tips are based on over 200,000 past match simulations. When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Murgett Vs Emburgh is now available here.
Finn Murgett vs Jake Van Emburgh Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Murgett 0 - 0 Emburgh
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Murgett has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Emburgh has won 41.14%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Murgett, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Emburgh has won 44.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.04% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Murgett has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Emburgh has saved 44.04% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Murgett has won 62.96% of matches played (W/L 17/ 10), with Emburgh winning 48% (W/L 24/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Murgett has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 7/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Emburgh has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 52/ 38), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Murgett has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.96% of matches (W/L 17/ 10), where as Emburgh has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48% of matches (W/L 24/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Murgett has played against opponents with an average rank of 50.7 while Emburgh has played against players with an average rank of 101.36.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Murgett has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Emburgh has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player formance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below. Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Murgett has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Emburgh has converted 43.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
55% (24-20)
Career Total W/L
53% (74-65)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
24% (4-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Finn Murgett vs Jake Van Emburgh For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Murgett VS Emburgh
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stats 
Finn Murgett
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
43%
(
19 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
|||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Finn Murgett | Jake Van Emburgh |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 36% (4/7) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 39% (41/65) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.33 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 17 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:19:36 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 67.8 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (161/255) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 61% (98/161) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 37% (35/94) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 67% (8/12) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (99/275) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Finn Murgett Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Neff
Player
Finn Murgett
48%
(
36 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Finn Murgett
Player
Brandon Carpico
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeremy Jin
Player
Finn Murgett
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
72
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Finn Murgett
Player
Rostislav Galfinger
49%
(
47 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
6
Aces
8
9
Double Faults
4
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
43%
(
21 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
85
|
6-7(0) 7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Jake Van Emburgh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Charlton
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Fabio Nestola
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Esquici
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Cooper Woestendick
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
2
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
0
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Murgett Vs Emburgh Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Murgett are available here and Emburgh photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
